|
Upcoming Events
North
American Lake Management Society International
Symposium. Monona Terrace, Madison. November
9-11.
Chippewa Valley Environmental
Forum. Wise Nature Center at Beaver Creek Reserve, Fall
Creek, WI. November 9. Learn about the world of science where
we live, work, and play. Download
the forum brochure to register.
Save the Date!
Southeast Region Lakes Workshop.
Richard T. Anderson Education Center - Waukesha County
Technical College (Pewaukee campus). February 18, 2006.
28th annual Wisconsin Lakes
Convention. KI Convention Center, Green Bay. April 20-22,
2006. Hands Across the Water. This year's convention
will focus on civic engagement skills in supporting clean,
healthy, lakes and waterways in Wisconsin.
|
|
|
Bills introduced into the state legislature
could negatively affect lakes |
|
Several
bills have been introduced in the Wisconsin State
Legislature that could negatively affect lakes if
they make their way through the legislature. The Wisconsin
Association of Lakes is following the progress of
these bills (outlined below).
AB-71:
Determination of the ordinary high water mark (OHWM)
Under current law, DNR is responsible for determining
the location of the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM)
on a lake. The OHWM is a critical line, because it
is the boundary used to measure the shoreland zoning
building setback and the division between public lakebeds
and private riparian ownership. Under this proposed
bill, if a county disagrees with the DNR’s determination
of the OHWM, the county's OHWM determination would
stand.
The Wisconsin Association of Lakes recognizes that
determination of the OHWM is critical to private riparian
property owners and the public. However, the Wisconsin
Association of Lakes has a number of serious concerns
with this Bill:
- this Bill appears to be based on the perception
that any determination made by a county government
will be more accurate than one made by the State,
but the bill does not establish any qualifications
for the individuals who conduct these determinations.
This bill offers no basis for property owners or
the Legislature to assume that county personnel
will produce more reliable results than state employees.
- WAL is not persuaded that establishing 72 new
OHWM authorities will make these determinations
more accurate, more consistent or more favorable
to either private or public interests.
- this Bill could be found to be an impermissible
delegation of authority over a statewide responsibility
to a county government in violation of the Wisconsin
Constitution.
The Wisconsin Association of Lakes Board of Directors
unanimously voted to oppose this Bill.
AB-734:
limiting rules regarding the placement of rip-rap
Natural shorelines provide important habitat for
fish and wildlife, help control erosion, and filter
out pollutants before they enter our lakes. Artificial
erosion control methods, such as rip-rap,
may help control erosion, but they can also destroy
important fish and wildlife habitat and do not filter
pollutants.
Rip-rap may be an appropriate erosion control method
in some situations. The current shoreland erosion
control rules (NR-328) approved by the legislature
this past Spring, allow exemptions and general or
individual permits for a wide range of shore erosion
control structures, including rip-rap.
The proposed bill (AB 734) would set a new standard
for decisions on placement of rip-rap in public waters
that might cause tremendous losses of fish and wildlife
habitat. The proposed standard allows conversion of
natural shoreline to rock based simply on verification
that erosion exists. Erosion can be found to exist
on any shoreline, even on the most undeveloped waterways.
The bill does not improve the ability of waterfront
property owners to prevent loss of property to erosion.
The Wisconsin Association of Lakes board of directors
unanimously voted to oppose this bill for the following
reasons:
- the Bill subverts the legislative and rulemaking
processes that created reasonable rules, standards,
and a process by which riparian owners can pursue
efforts to protect against shoreline erosion.
- the current statute and adminstrative rules are
flexible; they allow a variety of erosion control
methods, including rip-rap, and DNR experts work
with property owners to find the best methods to
prevent erosion and protect our lakes.
The Wisconsin Association of Lakes Board of Directors
unanimously voted to oppose this bill.
AB 299:
Weakening of Shoreland Protections
The quality of our lakes is dependent on the health
of their watersheds. Nothing has a more profound effect
on our lakes than the decisions we make on how we
use the land that surrounds them. Increasing development
density within the watershed and poorly planned development
on sensitive shorelands can negatively impact our
lakes in the following ways:
- Reducing water quality by increasing the amount
of polluted runoff making its way into our lakes
from roads, lawns, construction sites, storm sewers,
and other sources.
- Altering or destroying important shoreland habitat
that supports fish and wildlife.
- Changing the character of our lakes by altering
scenic beauty we associate with our lakes.
- Lowering property values.
Current shoreland zoning ordinances are one way to
protect our lakes from the harmful effects of poorly
planned development.
AB 299 would eliminate county shoreland zoning regulations
for land that is annexed by a city or village from
a town. Its passage would dramatically reduce water
protections by eliminating protections for some areas
on lakes, allowing development to be closer to the
water and at greater densities.
The Wisconsin Association of Lakes supports strong
shoreland zoning rules that protect water quality,
fish and wildlife habitat, natural scenic beauty,
and enhance public rights and private property values.
|
|
|
|
|
Pier rules move forward |
|
The passage of the "Job Creation Act" (2003 Act 118)
included a legislative directive within the statute
for the DNR to codify pier size standards contained
in the DNR's existing guidance document, known as
the Pier Planner.
The cumulative impact of multiple piers and related
activities can adversely impact water quality and shorelines;
these rules are not about individual piers, but rather setting
statewide minimum standards for piers so that we can all
continue to enjoy and use our lakes. Local governments are
free to create stricter pier standards if they are necessary
to protect property values and clean, safe, healthy lakes.
The Wisconsin Association of Lakes has served on the pier
rule advisory group since last summer. We have some concerns
with the proposed rule, but we believe this is an important
rule to help preserve the character and quality of our lakes
as well as give property owners certainty that they can
continue to use their existing piers.
An analysis
of a recent lake survey by the DNR shows the vast majority
(82%) of Wisconsin's piers would not need a state permit under
the proposed rules. Another 18% would require only a general
permit--a permanent gaurentee for property owners that their
existing pier conforms with standards. Only a few exceptional
piers would require an individual permit.
After six public hearings and many public comments, the
Natural Resources Board voted to approve the proposed rule
with a few amendments (see NRB
minutes from their September 28 meeting). The proposed
rule now goes to the legislature for approval (the rule is not
yet scheduled to go before the legislature at the time of this
writing). If you have concerns regarding piers, please write
your legislator.
|
|
View WAL's position on the proposed
pier rules (NR 326) |
|
|
Northern forest land is for sale |
|
Hundreds of thousands of acres once held by the state's
large paper companies are now in the hands of real
estate investment trusts and timberland investment
management organizations. One real estate investment
company, Plum Creek Timber Co., headquartered in Seattle,
is the single largest private property owner in the
state, with title to more than a half-million acres
in several northern Wisconsin counties.
And unlike Wisconsin's paper companies, which held forest
land for pulp for their mills, companies such as Plum Creek
manage forest lands primarily as an investment, say forestry
and real estate specialists who have been monitoring the
trend. Little by little, they are selling off land, sometimes
in parcels as small as 40 acres, which are then snapped up by
developers and subdivided.
Healthy lakes depend on healthy forests. Forests slow down
runoff headed for lakes, help filter pollutants--such as
phosphorus and sediments-- before they enter our lakes, and
are an improtant source of nutrients and organic material for
lakes. Large parcels of uninterrupted forest land with limited
human disturbance are essential to maintaining good habitat
for plants and wildlife, and opportunities for quiet
recreation, such as hiking.
|
|
Read the full article
online. |
|
|
Keeping the North the North |
|
A decade in the making, the Northern Initiatives
still point the way toward reasoned development that
sustains the character of the Wisconsin’s Northwoods.
Just how do we preserve the character and flavor of
“the North?” That's the question community leaders
and natural resource managers were asking in the late
1980s and early ‘90s in the face of sweeping change
across the region. They developed a long-range plan
to help define a vision of the North.
90 percent of people surveyed for the first Northern
Initiatives study said they were “somewhat” or “very”
concerned about shoreline development. Northern communities
have since used a range of approaches to better protect lakes
and rivers while still allowing economic growth.
|
|
Read how this effort is faring
today in Wisconsin Natural Resources Magazine |
|
|
First citation issued for weeds on boat
trailer |
|
A conservation warden issued the state's first citation
for weeds found on a boat trailer to a Pelican Lake
property owner after he refused to remove weeds pointed
out by a volunteer boat landing inspector prior to
launching his boat. Mandatory weed removal prior to
launching a boat is designed to protect state lakes
from aquatic invasive species (AIS), such as Eurasian
water milfoil and curlyleaf pondweed.
Until this first citation, DNR had an education- only
policy. However, after three years of public awareness, Barb
Krause, who heads up the launch- monitoring program for the
lake association said, “If people don't want to be educated
and knowingly violate the law, then it's time to write them
tickets. We've got to keep the exotic species out or it will
have far-reaching effects on water quality, taxes, recreation
and property values.”
DNR is still focused on education, and may not cite people
who clearly aren't aware of the law. Citations are more likely
if there is evidence that the boat and trailer owner has
knowledge of the law, but violated it anyway.
|
|
Read the full story in the Vilas
County News Review |
|
|
Clean Boats, Clean Waters: What we have learned at the
boat landings |
|
In 2005, volunteer watercraft inspectors inspected
over 9,000 boats, and contacted almost 20,000 people
in the process. Upon close inspection volunteers often
uncovered hidden plants on boat trailors and other
recreational equipment. Data from this year's inspections
revealed the following:
- 6% of all inspected boats had vegetation attached when
they approached the landing.
- 23% of all inspected boats had vegetation attached as
the boat pulled away from the landing.
- 16% of boaters were not informed of Wisconsin's illegal
to launch law (Section 30.715 Stat. 2001 WI Act 16), which
prohibits launching a trailer if aquatic plants or zebra
mussels are attached.
- 75% of boaters understand the role they play in moving
aquatic plants and animals from one water body to another.
The 23% of boats pulling away from landings with vegetation
attached amounts to over 143,000 boats that could potentially
transport and infect another water body with Eurasian water
milfoil, zebra mussels, or other invasive species!
Volunteers reporting this information are in support of
amending the current law to also make it illegal to transport
attached vegetation. The data collected at the boat landings
supports this change. If you too support this change, contact
your legislative representatives and encourage them to
amend Wisconsin's current law to make it illegal to both
launch and transport. |
|
|
|
|
New invasive species resource available
online |
|
Aquatic Invasive Species: A Handbook for Education Efforts
is a compilation of information on statewide programs,
resources, contacts, case studies, and action strategies,
including some suggested approaches for designing successful
local education efforts. A resource CD filled with articles,
fact sheets, presentations, and more accompanies the handbook.
|
|
Download online version of the
handbook and other invasive species resources |
|
|
Help lakes by managing leaves |
|
Leaves and grass clippings that make their way into
lakes and decompose can significantly increase nutrient
levels, which can lead to nuisance algea and related
water quality problems. To help keep leaves out of
your lake:
- Compost leaves for a nutrient-rich fertilizer for your
gardens, or till them directly into the garden.
- Chop leaves into small particles with a lawnmower so
they decompose directly into the lawn.
- Rake leaves into piles at the edge of the street but not
into the street or ditch. Sweep or rake leaves out of the
street, gutter or ditch so they don't wash down into the
storm drain.
Madison area groups are conducting a campaign to encourage
homeowners to keep leaves out of the Madison lakes. Lake
groups may find this approach applicable to their lake.
|
|
Read full article about Madison's
Love your Lakes, Don't Leaf Them campaign |
|
|
New tax guide for wetland landowners |
|
This new publication from the Wisconsin Wetlands
Association helps landowners evaluate eligibility
for property tax breaks on wetlands and other conservation
lands.
The guidebook is designed to help landowners anticipate the
property tax consequences of wetland restoration decisions and
to ensure that the wetlands they currently own are properly
assessed and taxed.
The guide will also help natural resource professionals
answer landowner questions about the tax implications of
wetland restoration and other stewardship decisions, questions
land managers cite as "on the top of the list" when consulting
with landowners about new projects.
|
|
Download publication "What does it
cost to own a wetland?" |
|
|
Receiving the e-lake letter, but not a
member of WAL? |
|
We hope you have found our e-lake letter interesting and
helpful. If you are not currently a member of WAL, please
consider joining
us in working for clean, safe, healthy lakes for everyone.
Your membership support helps WAL co-sponsor multiple lake
education workshops and conferences across the state that
reach thousands of Wisconsin lake users each year, work with
the legislature to ensure our lakes are protected for
generations to come, and keep lake enthusiasts informed
through publications such as out monthly e-lake letter and
quarterly newsletter, The Lake Connection.
|
|
|
| |