![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| • • | |||||||||
Economic benefits of shoreland protection Waterfront property owners, local governments, economies, and taxpayers all benefit economically as a result of the amenities that shoreland zoning preserves: clean water, wildlife, scenic beauty, and peace and quiet. Surveys of Wisconsin lakefront property owners and visitors consistently rate these as the amenities that attract them to the water. Shoreline frontage values in Vilas and Oneida counties increased an average of 7 to 12 % when towns had zoning requirements with a minimum 200 feet of water frontage for lots, according to a University of Wisconsin study based on data collected on 892 vacant lakefront properties from 1986-1995. The study found that the zoning requirement, by preserving clean water, natural scenic beauty and peace and quiet, generated an economic gain that more than offset the economic loss resulting from the constraints on development (Spalatro and Provencher. 2000). An improvement of 3 feet in the depth of water clarity would result in $11 to $200 more per foot of shoreline property value, potentially generating millions of dollars in increased value per lake according to a 5-year Maine study of 900 lakefront properties on 34 lakes. Likewise, declining water clarity accounted for a 10 % to 20 % drop in selling price. A 2003 Minnesota study used Minnesota lakes and data to replicate the Maine research study. The implicit prices of water quality were determined and calculations were made to illustrate the changes in property prices on the Minnesota study lakes if a one-meter change in water clarity (using Secchi disk readings) would occur. Expected property price changes for these lakes are in the magnitude of tens of thousands to millions of dollars. The evidence shows that management of the quality of lakes is important to maintaining the natural and economic assets of this region.
|
|||||||||
|
"Working for clean, safe, healthy lakes for everyone" |
|||||||||